The following is a personal essay that reflects the opinion of its author.
As America watches the Lindsay Clancy trial, I keep hearing the same comment from mothers online and in my own circles: That could have been me.
Many of us recognize ourselves in her story. The lack of support, the sleepless nights, the panic and desperation, what it feels like when no one is listening, and losing yourself and not knowing where to turn.
As I write this, jurors are deliberating Clancy’s fate. I am not on the jury, and I am not a psychiatrist. I cannot tell you what happened that day. I am not equipped to judge her, nor do I aim to turn Clancy into a folk hero. Three children are dead, and of course, their lives should remain at the center of this story.
But I am a neurodivergent mother who recognizes a distress flare when I see one. Modern psychiatric care is still frighteningly ill-equipped to treat women whose brains sit at the intersection of neurodivergence, mental illness, and hormonal change, and women with ADHD should be paying very close attention to that fact.
After following what happened before Clancy’s children died, I believe so much more could have been done. I think modern psychiatry should be brave enough now to reflect on what happened and ask how to prevent such tragedies.
Treat ADHD mothers as the high-risk group we are.
For years, women with ADHD have been telling doctors that their brains seem to change with their hormones, including during periods, pregnancy, postpartum, perimenopause, and menopause. Science is finally beginning to catch up, but not nearly fast enough.
A 2023 Swedish study found that women diagnosed with ADHD before pregnancy were about five times as likely to be diagnosed with postpartum depression and more than five times as likely to be diagnosed with postpartum anxiety as women without ADHD. That’s significant.
Nearly 17% of mothers with ADHD developed postpartum depression and almost 25% developed an anxiety disorder. (Side note: I had both, but the outdated Edinburgh scale used to measure postpartum depression symptoms, which hasn’t been updated since it was developed nearly 40 years ago, didn’t catch them.)
An even newer U.S. study also found higher postpartum psychiatric distress among women with ADHD.
This means women with ADHD are not only more likely to develop postpartum mental health problems, but the ones they do develop are likely to be more severe. Why are we not changing the standard of care for these at-risk groups?
Why were there no warnings from my doctors, no mention of this risk during prenatal visits? So often, the mother is treated as a vessel for a person in need of care, not a person in need of care themselves.
The vulnerability is not limited to just postpartum life, though. A 2025 study found women with ADHD are nearly three times more likely to experience premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Another detail I didn’t know when I needed to, but probably because it is just now being studied.
Fill in the care gaps to mend a broken system.
Mental illness does not operate on a referral timeline and often patients are given the runaround trying to find in-network providers who are accepting new patients with availability within a reasonable timeframe.
When somebody finally says they need psychiatric help, we should treat that moment as an intervention point, not the beginning of an administrative waiting period or mental health care scavenger hunt. Unfortunately, I know the hunt well. I first saw a therapist. Then I needed someone else to assess me for ADHD. Then I needed another provider to prescribe medication, but the wait was too long, so I sought support from my primary care doctor. All of this took precious time while I was struggling. Imagine navigating that system while your brain is in psychiatric distress.
We need bridge care between referral and specialty treatment. We need urgent perinatal psychiatric consultation. We need systems that let obstetric and primary-care clinicians get real-time psychiatric expertise instead of handing a patient a phone number and hoping for the best. Perinatal psychiatry access programs already offer a model for doing exactly that. This is not some futuristic healthcare fantasy. We already know how to do it.
Finally, we need to stop treating postpartum like a definitive six-to-eight-week period. The postpartum effects on a mother’s body, mind, health and identity last closer to eight years — with women experiencing elevated levels of anxiety and depression for that duration. We need more postnatal check-ups before and after the six-week-postpartum visit for all mothers, but especially those at higher risk for developing psychiatric issues.
Stop making the sickest person in the room coordinate her own care.
In the months leading up to her children’s deaths, Clancy was prescribed 13 different psychiatric medications by multiple providers, including psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, emergency department doctors, and inpatient psychiatric staff.
This should make every healthcare provider ask one question: Who was seeing the whole picture?
Psychiatry desperately needs better collaboration and continuity of care. If a provider leaves a practice, a patient with significant psychiatric risk should get a warm handoff. Instead, they are often left with little notice and the feeling that they have to start their entire mental healthcare journey from scratch. If somebody is discharged from inpatient psychiatric care, the next appointment should already exist. The onus should not solely be on the patient to make sure that happens. If an OB-GYN, therapist, psychiatrist, and primary-care physician are treating the same postpartum mother, they should not operate in silos.
A systematic review published in The Lancet Psychiatry found that perinatal mental healthcare is hindered by barriers at multiple levels, including unclear referral pathways, inadequate collaboration and lack of continuity. In the corporate world, nobody would accept handing a high-risk client from team to team without a clear owner. Yet in medicine, we routinely make vulnerable patients become their own case managers.
Treat postpartum psychiatric risk before it becomes a crisis.
From 2017 through 2019, mental health conditions accounted for nearly a quarter of pregnancy-related deaths in the majority of states, making them the most frequent underlying cause. Psychiatric risk should be monitored as closely as blood pressure.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends screening for depression and anxiety at the initial prenatal visit, later in pregnancy and postpartum; screening for bipolar disorder before starting medication for depression or anxiety; and providing immediate medical attention when postpartum psychosis is suspected. Just as important, ACOG says screening should be paired with systems that ensure timely assessment, treatment, monitoring and follow-up.
This sounds great on paper, but is this happening? We currently have no system in place to ensure those recommendations are followed. If a woman has a significant psychiatric history, she should leave pregnancy with a postpartum mental health plan just as surely as she leaves with instructions about bleeding, blood pressure and incision care. Who is monitoring her? When is her first psychiatric follow-up? Who does her partner call if she stops sleeping? What happens if her symptoms suddenly escalate? What medications is she taking? Who is responsible for looking at all of them together? This is maternal healthcare. We need to stop treating it as optional.
Quit letting insurance companies practice medicine.
Your psychiatrist may be brilliant, but that doesn’t matter much if you cannot see them. Your therapist could be perfect for you, but what if they are not in network? Your medication might be working, but what if administrative barriers interrupt your access to it? So often, insurance is the end-all-be-all when it comes to mental health outcomes. We need to stop letting insurance companies have the final say.
In psychiatric medicine, continuity itself should be part of the treatment, yet our system routinely makes patients change clinicians because of network rules, navigate prior authorization while in distress, or choose among providers based on who accepts their insurance rather than who best understands their condition.
For me, it happens often that my 90-day prescription gets adjusted to a 30-day supply — one that is exceedingly less convenient for my ADHD brain to manage — because my insurer changed some rule without notice. My insurance company should not have more influence over my psychiatric care than the doctor treating me.
Get with the times and, for goodness’ sake, study women.
We have a long way to go in women’s health, especially at the intersection of neurodivergence, mental health, and hormonal shifts. A 2025 systematic review of ADHD and female sex hormones found just 11 eligible studies. The researchers concluded that hormonal changes may affect ADHD symptoms, but major hormonal milestones, including menopause, need much more study. While we wait for the research, women are still having babies and entering major life transitions, medical decisions, and hormonal shifts essentially in the dark.
Here is perhaps the most astonishing detail in all of this: Postpartum psychosis still isn’t included in the DSM as its own distinct diagnosis. At the same time, researchers studying women with ADHD continue to describe major unanswered questions about menstruation, pregnancy, postpartum hormonal changes, and menopause.
This is 2026. Women should not still be walking into doctors’ offices describing predictable changes in our brains during major hormonal transitions only to discover that we are explaining a phenomenon that medicine has barely sniffed. Study us! Study ADHD across the menstrual cycle. Study ADHD medications across hormonal states. Study PMDD and pregnancy and postpartum conditions. Study perimenopause and menopause. And then translate that research into standards of care.
As I say this, unfortunately, federal policy is making women’s health research harder to conduct. In 2025, the Trump administration terminated thousands of NIH grants, with women researchers disproportionately affected, and federal agencies have subjected research proposals to political screening for disfavored language. At the National Science Foundation, reported screening terms included words such as “women,” “female” and “females.” If women’s bodies and brains have been understudied for generations, this is precisely the wrong moment to pull back. We should be pouring money into understanding women’s health, not making scientists fight to keep studying it.
It’s time for change.
The lesson I take from the Lindsay Clancy case is that mental illness can become dangerous when under-supported by bad systems. Most women with postpartum depression, ADHD, anxiety, PMDD, or other psychiatric conditions will never hurt their children. Postpartum psychosis itself is rare. We should say that loudly because stigma also prevents women from asking for help. But rare does not mean unforeseeable.
In Clancy’s case, I believe there were opportunities to intervene earlier, coordinate better, monitor more closely, and recognize that a woman’s rapidly deteriorating psychiatric health after childbirth demanded a different level of response and care.
Three children died in a wealthy and technologically advanced country. We should be willing to ask whether our system gave their mother every possible chance to get well before the unthinkable happened. So much needs to change from policy to societal expectations on mothers and maternal mental health support. But when I think about the standard of care we’ve allowed to persist in modern psychiatry, I’m, frankly, appalled.
It’s about damn time to make Lindsay Clancy’s story the last of its kind.
If you or someone you know is in immediate danger or experiencing a mental-health crisis, call or text 988. For postpartum mental-health support and resources, contact Postpartum Support International or 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline
ADHD Moms and Postpartum Health: Next Steps
ADDITUDE IS HUMAN
Artificial intelligence does not create or edit any written content published by ADDitude. Our editorial team is 100% human, and our mission is simple: listen to and serve our readers with hand-crafted, expert-informed resources. To support ADDitude, please consider subscribing. Your readership and support help make our commitment possible. Thank you.